I asked some of the photographers who have been interviewed in the Documentary Photography Review podcasts to share their thoughts and experiences in response to a series of 12 questions. (You can read the responses to last week’s question, and sign up to the DPR newsletter to be kept informed of future articles.)
This week I ask:
What’s been your most memorable moment as a documentary photographer?
Giving City of London police officers impromptu lessons in optics and art history during the shooting of one project was pretty fun.
Not sure that there has been a single most memorable moment. I feel that every time I meet a new subject it is memorable moment.
The launch of my most significant exhibition at Brighton Station, the culmination of 3 months intensive work.
I guess what I am experiencing now. I am documenting the Latin American community and retailers in Elephant and Castle, London and I became part of the decorum. Everyone knows me, welcomes me and informs me of everything that is happening – sharing their personal stories around a beer – this is priceless.
It is hard to pick one, I think in this last years there was quite a few, but maybe I will choose when I was covering the funeral of President Hugo Chávez. It was the moment where I actually felt I was living a piece of history.
Once ‘The Last of the Billingsgate Fish Porters’ multimedia piece had been published on the Foto8 website and on the Guardian online, I went back to the fish market a few days before the porters were made redundant. The love I got from the porters was unbelievable. They were just so happy and grateful that I kept my word, portrayed them with humour and dignity, and got their story out before the end.
I don’t have a very good memory although I can tell you pretty much where every photograph I’ve ever taken over the last 18yrs as a professional, was taken. Photography is potentially a surrogate memory for me. I’d also say I don’t have a most memorable moment. There’s loads of them. The ones that are the most absurd are my favourite. I was a guidebook photographer at the start of my career and there were some extremes encountered while doing that, bizarrely, given what a safe form of photography guidebook stuff can be. As a visual storyteller I’d rather stick to looking outwards but here’s one for you: Nearly freezing to death in -34degrees while walking back to the town of Van from its nearby magical lake, being attacked by a dog and then being rescued incredibly slowly by a baker driving a milk float type vehicle. All while accidentally being out after dark in contravention of a curfew in eastern Turkey due to the current fighting between the police and the PKK. I ended up thawing out at a post-sundown Ramadan meal and finally being given a lift home by Gabriel Burn’s scary doppelgänger.
I think the first time I saw my work in print.
I really enjoyed working on my city farm story – Urban Utopia. I’m not a massive fan of London, but it was so great to meet and be welcomed in by so many people. It was the first project I really got stuck into and spent a lot of time on, and it was very rewarding to have created such a large body of work for the first time.
being invited for lunch in a house in the Andes. It was memorable because for the first time after a month I had been accepted in the community.
Don’t miss out on the 8 remaining articles in this series – sign up to the DPR newsletter to be informed of newly published articles and podcasts twice a month – SIGN UP HERE TO STAY INFORMED!
Tagsdocumentary photographersdocumentary photographyexperiencephotographic practice
I shoot, write, talk, curate, and teach about photography, journalism, history and art. Lecturer at the London College of Communication and run the Disphotic blog
Photojournalist and documentary photographer. My photography work is motivated by my desire to investigate, expose and stimulate public response seeking the potentials to change a path, to modify a legislation, to tell a story otherwise untold.
I am a London-based portrait and documentary and documentary photographer with 20 years of experience. In between my regular portrait and documentary commissions I undertake personal projects relating to issues that I'm passionate about.
Eduardo Leal is a Portuguese freelance documentary photographer focusing on Latin America social issues and politics and Portuguese traditions.
At present I work as freelance portrait and documentary photographer, based in London. I have had my photos published in the Guardian, the Telegraph Magazine, the Big Issue, the NZZ newspaper and the Foto8 website, amongst others.
Tim works as a photographer, artist and educator taking on photographic commissions, workshops and teaching within the UK. Often working collaboratively, his projects document our relationship with our surroundings.
Originally a painter, Hannah Mornement is now a freelance documentary and reportage photographer, currently based in Brighton. Hannah has focused on people, places and humanitarian issues and has had over 10 years experience within the humanitarian and development sector.
I am a Sicilian photographer and filmmaker. I have been based in Italy, Cyprus and London working as a freelance photographer, commercial and photography teacher.
There are two main reasons to restore and revive a film: one is artistic merit; the other is historical significance. The French director Louis Malle’s 1958 film “Elevator to the Gallows,” opening at Film Forum today, in a new restoration, meets the second standard but not the first. The direction isn’t particularly inventive, the script isn’t very substantial, and even the excellent cast, headed by Jeanne Moreau and Maurice Ronet, isn’t given much to do. Its historical significance, however, is that it looked, for a moment, like what a New Wave film might be—and even offered crucial elements that burst into full flower when the real thing came along.
Written by Malle and Roger Nimier (based on a novel by Noël Calef), “Elevator” is a melancholy melodrama that’s centered on the office of an arms dealer, Simon Carala (Jean Wall). His wife, Florence (Moreau), and his right-hand man, Julien Tavernier (Ronet), are in love, and they plot a crime that goes ludicrously awry when Julien gets stuck in an elevator. A second crime story, involving a young tough guy named Louis (Georges Poujouly) and a shopgirl (Yori Bertin) who are incidentally connected to Julien, soon follows. The elevator mishap, the center of the movie, is absurd and turns the film into an instant and derisive comedy. Yet Malle directs it, and the whole film, unrelievedly earnestly, adding a sneer of world-weary indifference that plays like a pose—but that pose has an intellectual foundation. Malle stuffs the movie with sociopolitical markers, starting with war talk. Julien is well known as a former paratrooper in France’s wars in Vietnam and Algeria (the latter, ongoing when the film was made) and as a former member of the Foreign Legion. Talk of recent wars and their fallout crops up throughout the film. When Louis, the petty hoodlum, meets a fatuous middle-aged German who complains about the lack of champagne during the Occupation—the postwar occupation of Germany by the Allies—Louis even talks like a case study, responding that he himself doesn’t at all care about champagne: “My generation has other things on its mind: four years of Occupation, Indochina, Algeria.”
The story’s facile connections between France’s sordid politics and its sordid crimes, however, are less convincing than its other, nondramatic documentary elements. What Malle does with the creaky story is far better than the story itself: he films it on location in and around Paris. His cinematographer, Henri Decaë—who had already done striking work with Jean-Pierre Melville and would go on to shoot the first features of Claude Chabrol (including “À Double Tour”) and François Truffaut (“The 400 Blows”)—lends the streets and buildings of Paris and its suburbs a hard, gray cinematic life. The best performance, by far, is that of Moreau, because Malle includes extended scenes of her essentially doing nothing—wandering the streets of Paris at night and contemplating her troubles—and he had the inspiration to notice that Moreau doing almost nothing is an absorbing spectacle in itself.
“Elevator to the Gallows” isn’t a New Wave film, but it is significant for its proto-New-Wavishness, its efforts toward originality and modernity. More specifically, such incidental elements as a big American car and the theft of that big American car, the accidental discovery of a handgun in the glove compartment of that car, the thief of that car committing a murder with that gun and going on the run in Paris with his young and innocent girlfriend, the young woman’s cramped one-room apartment, the record player and art poster in the apartment, the classical music playing on the record player as she and her boyfriend go to bed, the fugitive who sees his picture on the front page of a newspaper—all of these details should seem familiar, because they all turn up in Jean-Luc Godard’s “Breathless,” which came out two years later.
Although “Breathless,” shot in 1959, is based on a widely reported true-crime story that took place in France in 1952—and on a story that he and François Truffaut developed in 1956, long before Malle’s film was made—it was made in the light of a local cinematic renewal of which Malle (who was only twenty-six when he completed the film) was a crucial agent. Godard was working as a critic at the time of its release, but he never reviewed “Elevator to the Gallows,” and didn’t speak of it in interviews at the time of his first film’s release. But he had to have seen it.
Even the jazz-based soundtrack of “Breathless,” composed by the notable pianist Martial Solal, flows from the same stream. If there is a third reason to restore a film, it’s for the artistic merit of its ancillary elements, and that’s where “Elevator to the Gallows” stands out. Its score, composed by Miles Davis and performed (in Paris) by Davis and his local pickup quintet (featuring three good French musicians and the great American expatriate drummer Kenny Clarke), is worth hearing entirely on its own. It’s better than the film itself, by far, and there are better ways to hear it than in the movie—namely, by listening to a CD that features the entire studio sessions from which the score was edited.
Solal’s score for “Breathless” is memorable for its catchy themes and distinctive tone, but Solal noted that Godard took his half hour of music and reduced it mainly to two recurring five-note leitmotifs. Malle did no such thing with Davis’s music, featuring eight of the trumpeter’s extended improvisations, which run on the soundtrack for two or three minutes at a stretch. In “Milestones,” a magisterial two-volume biography of Davis, Jack Chambers puts the “Elevator to the Gallows” soundtrack recording into historical perspective, citing the use of jazz scores as a trend in the mid-to-late nineteen-fifties. “The use of jazz and jazz-derived soundtracks became so predominant,” he wrote, “that jazz came to seem like the natural backdrop for high-speed chases, mass mayhem, and cold-blooded murder, because the films for which jazz players were enlisted were uniformly violent.” Given that jazz is essentially an African-American art form and the movies were made by white producers, the association is both all the more unpleasant and all the more unfortunately explicable.
There’s nothing violent or sinister in Davis’s music for “Elevator to the Gallows,” which, despite its occasional origins, is both an enduringly mighty set of performances and a document of a hinge moment in Davis’s career, as the French release of the soundtrack sessions—featuring the entire batch of recordings in their original order and form—makes clear. For that matter, the texts in its booklet are themselves more deeply evocative of the spirit of Davis’s music than is the entire movie. They include a 1988 interview with the impresario Marcel Romano, who had arranged Davis’s European tour:
I had plans to produce a short film on jazz with Miles himself as the star. My idea was to film a recording session with musicians who were meeting for the first time, rehearsing and talking together. I wanted to show some of the atmosphere of a session to a wide audience, and also promote Miles, who was then far from being as famous as he is today.
Just imagining Romano’s unrealized film is a jazzical experience of cinematic value. The intended director was Jean-Paul Rappeneau (best known for his 1990 film “Cyrano de Bergerac,” starring Gérard Depardieu), who was working as an assistant to Malle on “Elevator” and “suggested that we ask him if he’d like Miles to record the music.”
Romano goes into detail on Davis’s process—Davis watched the film and took notes, and, soon thereafter, Romano heard Davis play “bits of themes” on his hotel-room piano that later turned up in the film. For the recording session, two weeks later, Davis brought the musicians into the studio with no preparation, and they played while watching the scenes. In the same interview, also included in the booklet, the bassist Pierre Michelot says that “what characterized the session is the absence of a defined theme.” Davis gave the band two chords, and “there was a semblance of structures, but they were a little fragmented compared to what we usually played.”
The recording session, and the European jaunt, caught Davis at a moment of musical transition. He had disbanded his first great quintet of 1955-56 because its other four members had become unreliable due to heroin addiction—and that included the tenor saxophonist John Coltrane, for whom the job was his first prominent one. Just before the trip, Davis assembled a new group, a quintet featuring the altoist Cannonball Adderley. Coltrane kicked his habit and joined Thelonious Monk’s quartet; that band had an instantly famous six-month run at the Five Spot, and Coltrane’s playing, under Monk’s influence, rapidly rose to heroic stature. When Davis returned to New York, at the end of 1957, he asked Coltrane to rejoin the group, making it a sextet; that group held together for two years and made musical history (Its most famous creation is the album “Kind of Blue.”) Chambers quotes a 1960 interview with Coltrane about the experience of rejoining Davis:
I found Miles in the midst of another stage of his musical development. There was one time in his past that he devoted to multichorded structures. He was interested in chords for their own sake. But now it seemed he was moving in the opposite direction to the use of fewer and fewer chord changes in songs. He used tunes with free-flowing lines and chordal direction.
The harmonic simplicity and thematic fragmentation of the “Elevator” music was neither a caprice nor a stopgap; it was a theory in motion, the very core of Davis’s great new idea and the idea of his great new style, and his powerfully expressive, highly concentrated, freely inspired performances for the movie are life sketches of a bold and innovative musical mind, a self-portrait of innovation on the wing.
Malle couldn’t know this, of course, but he did seek to be of the moment, and deployed documentary-style techniques that both aimed to catch what he thought was its essence and that signified it. He caught it, above all, in Davis’s music. Even though Malle’s dramatic sense was familiar and his visual sense was merely sincere, his impulses and yearnings and unfulfilled desires were fruitfully artistic; he pointed toward a modernity in which he couldn’t fully share, toward a boldness that he didn’t quite have, toward an originality that he only aspired to. He sought to refresh the French cinema, and he did so; those who came next—and did so very soon—took advantage of the invigorating new atmosphere and revolutionized the cinema itself.