Skip to content

Conclusion Of A Child Abuse Essay

of fathers in general and of families in diverse ethnic communities in particular with home visitation interventions, and (5) the need for follow-up services once the period of home visitation has ended.

Intensive Family Preservation Services

Intensive family preservation services represent crisis-oriented, short-term, intensive case management and family support programs that have been introduced in various communities to improve family functioning and to prevent the removal of children from the home. The overall goal of the intervention is to provide flexible forms of family support to assist with the resolution of circumstances that stimulated the child placement proposal, thus keeping the family intact and reducing foster care placements.

Eight of ten evaluation studies of selected intensive family preservation service programs (including five randomized trials and five quasi-experimental studies) suggest that, although these services may delay child placement for families in the short term, they do not show an ability to resolve the underlying family dysfunction that precipitated the crisis or to improve child well-being or family functioning in most families. However, the evaluations have shortcomings, such as poorly defined assessment of child placement risk, inadequate descriptions of the interventions provided, and nonblinded determination of the assignment of clients to treatment and control groups.

Intensive family preservation services may provide important benefits to the child, family, and community in the form of emergency assistance, improved family functioning, better housing and environmental conditions, and increased collaboration among discrete service systems. Intensive family preservation services may also result in child endangerment, however, when a child remains in a family environment that threatens the health or physical safety of the child or other family members.

Recommendation 6: Intensive family preservation services represent an important part of the continuum of family support services, but they should not be required in every situation in which a child is recommended for out-of-home placement.

Measures of health, safety, and well-being should be included in evaluations of intensive family preservation services to determine their impact on children's outcomes as well as placement rates and levels of family functioning, including evidence of recurrence of abuse of the child or other family members. There is a need for enhanced screening instruments that can identify the families who are most likely to benefit from intensive short-term services focused on the resolution of crises that affect family stability and functioning.

The value of appropriate post-reunification (or placement) services to the child and family to enhance coping and the ability to make a successful transition

This information was taken directly from Child Welfare Information Gateway

Conclusion

Preventing child abuse is not simply a matter of parents doing a better job, but rather it is about creating a context in which “doing better” is easier. Enlightened public policy and the replication of high-quality publicly supported interventions are only part of what is needed to successfully combat child abuse. It remains important to remind the public that child abuse and neglect are serious threats to a child’s healthy development and that overt violence toward children and a persistent lack of attention to their care and supervision are unacceptable. Individuals have the ability to accept personal responsibility for reducing acts of child abuse and neglect by providing support to each other and offering protection to all children within their family and their community. As sociologist Robert Wuthnow has noted, every volunteer effort or act of compassion finds its justification not in offering solutions for society’s problems but in offering hope “both that the good society we envision is possible and that the very act of helping each other gives us strength and a common destiny” (Wuthnow, 1991: 304). When the problem is owned by all individuals and communities, prevention will progress, and fewer children will remain at risk.

References

American Academy of Pediatrics, Council on Child and Adolescent Health. (1998). The role of home-visitation programs in improving health outcomes for children and families. Pediatrics, 101(3), 486-489.

Barr, R. G., Barr, M., Fujiwara, T., Conway, J., Catherine, N., & Brant, R. (2009). Do educational materials change knowledge and behaviour about crying and Shaken Baby syndrome? Canadian Medical Association Journal, 180(7), 727-733.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2009). Parent training programs: Insight for practitioners. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/ViolencePrevention/pdf/Parent_Training_Brief-a.pdf

Center for the Study of Social Policy (CSSP). (2007). Strengthening Families: A Guidebook for Early Childhood Programs. (Revised 2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

Chaffin, M. (2004) Is it time to rethink Healthy Start/Healthy Families? Child Abuse and Neglect, 28(6), 589-595.

Chaffin, M., Bonner, B., & Hill, R. (2001). Family preservation and family support programs: Child maltreatment outcomes across client risk levels and program types. Child Abuse and Neglect. 25(10), 1269-1289.

Chaloupka, F., & Johnston, L. (2007). Bridging the gap: Research informing practice and policy for healthy youth behavior. American Journal of Prevention Medicine, 33(4S), 147-161.

Cohn, A. (1983). An approach to preventing child abuse. (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: National Committee for Prevention of Child Abuse.

Daro, D. (1988). Confronting child abuse: Research for effective program design. New York, NY: The Free Press.

Daro, D. (1993). Child maltreatmentresearch: Implications for program design. In D. Cicchetti and S. Toth (Eds.), Child abuse, child development, and social policy (pp. 331-367). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

Daro, D. (2000). Child abuse prevention: New directions and challenges. Journal on Motivation, 46, 161-219. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

Daro, D., & Dodge, K. (2009). Creating community responsibility for child protection: Possibilities and challenges. Future of Children, 19(2), 67-94.

Daro, D., & Gelles, R. (1992). Public attitudes and behaviors with respect to child abuse prevention. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 7(4), 517-531.

Dias, M., Smith, K., deGuehery, K., Mazur, P., Li, V., & Shaffer, M. (2005). Preventing abusive head trauma among infants and young children: A hospital-based, parent education program. Pediatrics, 115, 2004-1896. Retrieved from http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/115/4/e470.full.pdf+html

Doll, L., Bonzo, S., Sleet, D., Mercy, J., & Haas, E. N. (Eds.). (2007). Handbook of Injury and Violence Prevention. New York, NY: Springer.

Farrow, F. (1997). Child protection: Building community partnerships: Getting from here to there. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.

Finkelhor, D., Jones, L., & Shattuck, A. (2011). Updated trends in child maltreatment, 2009. Durham, NH: University of New Hampshire, Crimes Against Children Research Center.

Geeraert, L., Van den Noortgate, W., Grietens, H., & Onghena, P. (2004) The effects of early prevention programs for families with young children at risk for physical child abuse and neglect: A meta-analysis. Child Maltreatment, 9(3), 277-291.

Gomby, D. (2005). Home visitation in 2005: Outcomes for children and parents. Invest in Kids Working Paper No. 7. Committee for Economic Development: Invest in Kids Working Group. Retrieved from the Wisconsin State Legislature website: http://legis.wisconsin.gov/lc/committees/study/2008/SFAM08/files/GombyHVoutcomes2005.pdf

Guterman, N. (2001). Stopping child maltreatment before it starts: Emerging horizons in early home visitation services. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Hahn, R., Bilukha, O., Crosby, A., Fullilove, M., Liberman, A., Moscicki, E., . . . (2003). First reports evaluating the effectiveness of strategies for preventing violence: Early childhood home visitation. Findings from the Task Force on Community Preventive Services. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 52(RR-14), 1-9. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5214a1.htm

Harrell, A., Cavanagh, S., & Sridharan, S. (1999). Evaluation of the Children at Risk Program: Results 1 year after the end of the program. National Institute of Justice Research in Brief. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

Horton, C. (2003). Protective factors literature review: Early care and education programs and the prevention of child abuse and neglect. Washington, DC: Center for the Study of Social Policy. Retrieved from http://strengtheningfamilies.net/images/uploads/pdf_uploads/LiteratureReview.pdf

Kempe, C. H., Silverman, F., Steele, B., Droegemueller, W., & Silver, H. (1962). The battered child syndrome. Journal of the American Medical Association, 181, 17-24.

MacLeod, J., & Nelson, G. (2000). Programs for the promotion of family wellness and the prevention of child maltreatment: A meta-analytic review. Child Abuse and Neglect, 24(9), 1127-1149.

Mannes, M., Roehlkepartain, E., & Benson, P. (2005). Unleashing the power of community to strengthen the well-being of children, youth, and families: An asset-building approach. Child Welfare, 84(2), 233-250.

Olds, D., Sadler, L., & Kitzman, H. (2007). Programs for parents of infants and toddlers: Recent evidence from randomized trials. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48(3/4), 355-391.

Reppucci, N., & Haugaard, J. (1989). Prevention of child sexual abuse: Myth or reality. American Psychologist, 44(10), 1266-1275.

Sedlak, A. J., Mettenburg, J., Basena, M., Petta, I., McPherson, K., Greene, A., . . . (2010). Fourth National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect (NIS–4): Report to Congress. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families.

Stoltzfus, E., & Lynch, K. (2009). Home visitation for families with young children. Washington DC: Congressional Research Service.

U.S. Advisory Board on Child Abuse and Neglect. (1991). Creating caring communities: Blueprint for an effective Federal policy on child abuse and neglect. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Children’s Bureau. (2010). Child maltreatment 2009. Retrieved from http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/pubs/cm09/index.htm

Wurtele, S., & Miller-Perrin, C. (1992). Preventing child sexual abuse: Sharing the responsibility. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

Wuthnow, R. (1991). Acts of compassion: Caring for others and helping ourselves. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.


Return to Special Needs

Citation

Child Welfare Information Gateway. (2011). Child maltreatment prevention: Past, present, and future. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Children’s Bureau.